FIELD
RECORDING
My general preference for all wildlife recording is to use an
MS stereo set-up on a tripod, cabled back to the recorder. Normally
this is a combination of Sennheiser MKH40 for mid and MKH30
for side: this gives a wide stereo field with a slight dead
area to the rear. In calm conditions I use no wind-sock, but
often this isn't possible. The cable length varies from 10m
to about 150m; sometimes I use a hide, even with 150m of cable.
The advantage of this approach is that the recordist does not
influence the behaviour of the subjects (in theory!) and, with
well-placed mics, individuals may come very close. The disadvantage
is that it is a more time-consuming and studied approach; and
150m of stereo cabling makes for a heavy backpack.
For more
opportunistic recording I use a Sennheiser MKH50 in a 20"
parabolic reflector or a Sennheiser MKH70 long gun mic; sometimes
these may be mounted on a tripod or hand-held, more often now
I tend to use a hand-held monopod, as a compromise.
The advantage
of the parabolic system is that it is highly directional, 'zooming
in' on individuals from a distance, like a telephoto lens, and
it acts as an acoustic amplifier to the sound along the direction
of the axis of the parabola (i.e. it boosts the sound coming
from the direction in which it is pointed). This also can help
in separating an individual from surrounding sound sources.
The disadvantage is that it produces a very biased frequency
response, boosting the upper mid-range, and does not function
for low frequency at all - the cut-off point being a function
of the width of the parabola. It's also a very cumbersome system
to carry around.
The gun
mic also is designed to be directional, but this works by rejecting
sound coming from the sides and does not give any acoustical
boost to the signal. On the other hand it does have a reasonably
flat frequency response that extends down to the low end, though
there is less side rejection on the low frequencies. The advantage
of this system is that it's fairly convenient to carry on a
walk, the disadvantage being that you need to get quite close
to the subject to get a decent recording.
So the parabolic
system works well as a quick way of picking up higher-pitched
sounds, such as the songs and calls of songbirds, but the gun
mic is better for the lower-pitched stuff like owls. Sounds
that have broad-band content (high and low
frequencies, such as geese or raven calls) can be recorded with
a parabolic mic, but they tend to sound a bit 'thin' and lack
impact.
Until a
few years ago all my recording was to DAT tape at 48k sample-rate,
16 bit; the first portable DAT recorders only recorded to 48k,
so having started with that sample-rate I decided to stick with
it even when I later used recorders that offered a 44.1k option.
At some pointed I added a Sound Devices MP2 microphone pre-amp
to the system; this gave improved clarity over the pre-amps
built into the DAT recorders. Now I use a Sound Devices 722
recorder at 24 bit, which offers sample-rates up to 192k. This
machine records to a built-in 40GB hard disk or compact flash
card.
In the last
few years quite a few card recorders have come on the market
at a lower price range, some very cheap. There's no doubt that
these can provide a reasonable recording device for those wanting
to do some nature recording on a tight budget, though they all
differ slightly in the facilities they offer. But none of the
lower-priced and few of the medium-priced units have really
quiet mic pre-amps, which become more important if one is interested
in recording ambiences, when normally the level of the sound
one is aiming to capture is very low.
When using
the hand-held systems I make spoken notes of any relevant details
at the end of the recording; this isn't possible when using
longer cables and I jot down basic notes in a small notebook.
Back in the studio, in the DAT days, I used to make written
notes on first going through the recordings, then transfer summary
details to a database. In the last eight years I've spent a
vast amount of time developing a more comprehensive database
in FilemakerPro and I now enter details directly into this.
I now set up a full audition of each recording session in Logic
and mark out passages of specific interest by creating a region
on a muted track with the original time location.
As it's
maturing, this system is working very well for me. The weakness
is that one is completely at the mercy of the software developers
and commercial developments in the IT industry. Future versions
of the software may not have the same facilities and previous
work may not transfer smoothly; and who knows if the software
will even be around in 20 years time.
More
info on wildlife sound recording ...
More info on
budget recorders ...
STUDIO
EDITING
One of the advantages of the new generation of recorders that
capture directly to hard disk or memory card is the speed with
which you can transfer the sound files to computer. With tape,
transfers had to be done in real time; now with firewire and
USB2 this is much quicker. The disadvantage is that you no longer
have the tape as the first level of archiving the original recording.
I transfer the original recording to a hard disk, which is then
backed up to a second hard disk and important recordings written
to DVD. These files are all documentary - as recorded, with
no editing.
As a general
practise I try to keep all editing to a minimum in productions,
some more than others depending on the purpose of the production.
Usually this will involve a light EQ: a slight shelving of the
low end frequencies for most recordings and some contouring
to counter the exaggerated upper mid of parabola recordings.
Some wildlife recordists use heavy EQ settings, especially where
cutting out all the low end on birdsong. In some ways this produces
a cleaner sound, but to me it sounds less natural and I prefer
to keep it as real as possible.
There may
be some time compression in a sequence as well as cutting out
any unwanted noise events (such as flies landing on the mic
or a car passing), though this depends on the final purpose
of the production. Time compression, where one cuts out uneventful
passages, essentially resulting in a sequence of highlights,
is a thorny issue. For strictly documentary sequences one should
keep the timing of the actual events; on the other hand, if
one is producing an identity guide of bird sounds, it's rather
wasteful to have long gaps between successive vocalisations,
as well as making the listener wait unnecessarily for the next
point of interest. It's essentially a producer's choice: the
important thing, where the production is intended to reflect
nature, is that the end result should not be misleading. Otherwise
it's a case of what is aesthetically satisfying; though of course
if one is using these sounds in free composition, such considerations
become less relevant.
When producing
the Wildsong soundscape CDs, I try to balance periods of activity
with emptier passages, as well as close-up sequences with more
ambient passages, so as to create a natural feel. I suppose
my aim is to create an album that would make a very satisfying
or idealised sound walk in the particular habitat or location
being covered.
I use a
variety of software for editing and compositing work on the
Mac platform: Logic is my main programme for selection of parts,
compositing and arranging, otherwise Bias Peak and lately Fission
for editing files, Barbabatch for file conversion, Waveburner
for CD mastering, and lately I've started using AudioFinder
to help organise the labyrinth of folders and files on hard
disk. I used to use Canary for generating sonograms, back in
the days of OS9. It's still my preferred software, but I've
had to jump ship from OS9 to keep abreast of other software
and hardware upgrades and haven't really settled on sonogram
software in OSX.
More
info on Mac audio software ...